Part One: Annotation
Euthanasia has been a topic of ongoing debate for a longer period. Individuals have conducted some studies to determine people’s opinions about the case. This paper will discuss Euthanasia’s general occurrence, especially on whether it should be legalized in hospitals and under which terms. It will be based on three aspects; personal choice, religion and morality, and physician’s judgment. This article will support the idea of Euthanasia. It involves several arguments supporting the process. First, death is a personal matter and no one is obliged to deny another individual the right to die. Another supporting argument is that euthanasia will help spare family and friends the pain of watching their loved ones suffer for a long period. Euthanasia will also allow individuals die with dignity and in control of their condition. The article will also address one major argument against the idea of Euthanasia. Euthanasia would affect the society’s respect for the value and significance of human life. Euthanasia would also undermine the work of doctors and nurses to take care of patients and save their lives.
Aspect 1: Personal Choice
1a
Brazier, Y. (2018). Euthanasia and assisted suicide: What are they and what do they mean?. Medicalnewstoday.com. Retrieved 29 March 2021, from https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/182951#euthanasia-and-assisted-suicide-.
The authors in this article discuss the different types of Euthanasia. First, the article provides a brief distinction between Euthanasia and assisted suicide whereby in Euthanasia, a health professional, for example, the doctor, has the authority through the law to terminate an individual’s life through painless methods through an agreement with the patient and family members. Euthanasia can also be classified as voluntary or involuntary. According to Brazier (2018), voluntary Euthanasia is when doctors run the whole process with consent, while involuntary is when doctors conduct the process to a person capable of providing consent but does not because maybe the doctors never involved them. Euthanasia in the United States varies between States. In contrast, Euthanasia is against the law, leading to a jail sentence in some countries. Every individual has their own choice about their life, and their decisions should always be respected. The articles suggest that an individual’s life should only be terminated through their consent.
b
Davis, N. (2019). Euthanasia and assisted dying rates are soaring. But where are they legal?. the Guardian. Retrieved 29 March 2021, from https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/jul/15/euthanasia-and-assisted-dying-rates-are-soaring-but-where-are-they-legal.
This article provided the difference between Euthanasia and assisted suicide. According to Davis (2019), the primary difference between the two types is the person responsible for the final act. The author describes Euthanasia as the effective steps doctors follow to terminate an individual’s life, while assisted suicide helps an individual terminate their life. In contrast, palliative sedation, a process whereby individuals request doctors to keep them under deep sedation until their death, is not Euthanasia.
c
Holland, K. (2019). What Is Euthanasia? Types, Legal Status, Facts, Controversy, and. Healthline. Retrieved 29 March 2021, from https://www.healthline.com/health/what-is-euthanasia.
This article provides a brief description of Euthanasia. According to Holland (2019), it is a process associated with multiple factors. The major factors include personal beliefs, local laws, and the mental health of an individual; Over the last centuries, people have debated the legality of Euthanasia. Euthanasia is legal when an individual can make the decision. However, the process of determining an individual’s mental abilities may not be clear. According to some studies, doctors may not understand when an individual is ready to make the decision.
Aspect 2: Religion and Morality
d
Chan, J. K. S. (2018). Moral Distinctions Between Passive and Active Euthanasia (Doctoral dissertation, California Institute of Technology).
This article discusses the moral distinctions between passive and active Euthanasia. There are different questions in which individuals should consider when trying to understand the Euthanasia concept. For instance, is there a moral distinction between the two types of Euthanasia? Passive Euthanasia involves killing a patient. In contrast, active Euthanasia is associated with letting the patient die.
Aspect 3: Physician’s Judgment and Ethical Consideration
e
Evenblij, K., Pasman, H. R. W., Van Der Heide, A., Hoekstra, T., & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. (2019). Factors associated with requesting and receiving Euthanasia: a nationwide mortality follow-back study focusing on patients with psychiatric disorders, dementia, or an accumulation of health problems related to old age. BMC medicine, 17(1), 1-12.
This article evaluates the factors involved in requesting and receiving Euthanasia. Factors including ethnicity, age, and attending physicians are associated with requesting Euthanasia. According to Evenblij (2019), factors like attending physicians, causes of death, age, and psychiatric disorder are associated with receiving Euthanasia. In contrast, through this study, the author states that dementia and psychiatric disorders are negatively involved in requesting and receiving Euthanasia.
Part Two: Source Evaluation
1a. this source is a current source, and it provides the appropriate analysis of the different types of Euthanasia. It a source commonly used in the analysis of this topic because it focuses on the major elements associated with Euthanasia.
1b. this article is not current, but it is acceptable to the user because it provided the reader with a clear understanding of the difference between Euthanasia and assisted dying. The article relates to the thesis because it focuses on explaining the difference between the two types.
1c. This source is not current, but it is acceptable because it clarifies the types of Euthanasia. The source strongly supports the thesis by explaining the major factors related to Euthanasia.
1d. While this source may not be current; it strongly supports my thesis by discussing the moral differences between active and passive Euthanasia. It also encourages individuals to solve the dilemma for them to understand the moral distinction between the two.
1e. this is a current scholarly article that is reliable and credible. The authors of this study had done great research to understand the factors associated with requesting Euthanasia.
References
Brazier, Y. (2018). Euthanasia and assisted suicide: What are they and what do they mean?. Medicalnewstoday.com. Retrieved 29 March 2021, from https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/182951#euthanasia-and-assisted-suicide-.
Chan, J. K. S. (2018). Moral Distinctions Between Passive and Active Euthanasia (Doctoral dissertation, California Institute of Technology).
Davis, N. (2019). Euthanasia and assisted dying rates are soaring. But where are they legal?. the Guardian. Retrieved 29 March 2021, from https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/jul/15/euthanasia-and-assisted-dying-rates-are-soaring-but-where-are-they-legal
Evenblij, K., Pasman, H. R. W., Van Der Heide, A., Hoekstra, T., & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. (2019). Factors associated with requesting and receiving Euthanasia: a nationwide mortality follow-back study focusing on patients with psychiatric disorders, dementia, or an accumulation of health problems related to old age. BMC medicine, 17(1), 1-12.
Holland, K. (2019). What Is Euthanasia? Types, Legal Status, Facts, Controversy, and. Healthline. Retrieved 29 March 2021, from https://www.healthline.com/health/what-is-euthanasia.
